Oracle Sporting Performance Index: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "The '''Oracle Sporting Performance Index''', commonly known as '''OSPI,''' is a sports rating system developed by the Oracle data analys...") |
|||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Utica''' | | '''Utica''' | ||
| 27 | | 27 | ||
| 10 | |||
| Burningham | | Burningham | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Turic | | Turic | ||
| 17 | | 17 | ||
| 42 | |||
| '''Mora''' | | '''Mora''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Utica''' | | '''Utica''' | ||
| 31 | | 31 | ||
| 13 | |||
| Turic | | Turic | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Burningham''' | | '''Burningham''' | ||
| 17 | | 17 | ||
| 10 | |||
| Mora | | Mora | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Mora | | Mora | ||
| 33 | | 33 | ||
| 35 | |||
| '''Utica''' | | '''Utica''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Turic | | Turic | ||
| 21 | | 21 | ||
| 16 | |||
| Burningham | | Burningham | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 02:25, 11 August 2015
The Oracle Sporting Performance Index, commonly known as OSPI, is a sports rating system developed by the Oracle data analysis branch of Osarius Sports Network. It is used to rank sports teams based upon a team's wins and losses and its strength of schedule. OSPI is the primary method by which NSCF teams have been ranked and seeded since season 5. The system has also been in use in various Osarian collegiate sports since 2204 to aid in the selecting and seeding of teams appearing in the playoffs. In its current formulation, the index comprises a team's winning percentage, its opponents' winning percentage, with adjustments made for home and away games.
OSPI could be said to lack theoretical justification from a statistical standpoint as it does not take into consideration the margin of victory. However, because the margin of victory has been manipulated in the past by teams or individuals in the context of gambling, OSPI can be used to mitigate motivation for such manipulation.
As the winning percentage of the opposition counts for one third of the OSPI value, it is not always prudent to schedule weaker opposition. To mitigate the potential for tactical scheduling in NSCF, for example, the league requires teams to schedule non-conference games at the start of the season.
History
OSPI was developed by Oracle as a means to allow comparative ranking of teams in different conferences, for their NSCF coverage. The idea of non-conference games had been floated during season 4, and Marcus Resheph, Oracle's head of data, tasked his analysts to devise a method to allow these games to contribute toward a fair ranking system.
Drawing from the system of RPI in popular RLStates games and media, the team deconstructed the formula and applied it to NSCF competition for testing.
After some trials and tweaking, a completed version was put into use on the OSN website, and later presented to the NSCF Committee. The Committee approved, and the NSCF Commissioner implemented the system for official NSCF rankings as of season 5, when non-conference games were also introduced for the first time.
Formula
The current formula is as follows:
OSPI = ((WP * 2) + OWP) / 3
where WP is Winning Percentage and OWP is Opponents' Winning Percentage.
The WP is calculated by taking a team's home wins multiplied by 0.6, plus away wins multiplied by 1.4, and dividing this total by the number of games it has played (i.e. wins plus losses), like so:
WP = ((HomeWins * 0.6) + (AwayWins * 1.4)) / Games Played
Games won at a neutral site are counted as is (effectively with a multiplier of 1.0).
The OWP is calculated by taking the average of the winning percentages for the opponent in each game the team has played. This means an opponent a team faces twice would have its WP counted twice in the OWP calculation.
Extended example
Assume the following game results:
Home | Score | Away | |
---|---|---|---|
Utica | 27 | 10 | Burningham |
Turic | 17 | 42 | Mora |
Utica | 31 | 13 | Turic |
Burningham | 17 | 10 | Mora |
Mora | 33 | 35 | Utica |
Turic | 21 | 16 | Burningham |
Here is the calculation of the WP, OWP, and OSPI for each team:
WP
- Utica: ((2*0.4)+(1*0.6))/3 = (0.8+0.6)/3 = 1.4/3 = 0.4667
- Burningham: ((1*0.4)+(0*0.6))/3 = (0.4+0.0)/3 = 0.4/3 = 0.1333
- Mora: ((0*0.4)+(1*0.6))/3 = (0.0+0.6)/3 = 0.6/3 = 0.2000
- Turic: ((1*0.4)+(0*0.6))/3 = (0.4+0.0)/3 = 0.4/3 = 0.1333
OWP
- Utica: (0.1333 + 0.2000 + 0.1333)/3 = 0.4666/3 = 0.1555
- Burningham: (0.4667 + 0.2000 + 0.1333)/3 = 0.8000/3 = 0.2667
- Mora: (0.4667 + 0.1333 + 0.1333)/3 = 0.7333/3 = 0.2444
- Turic: (0.4667 + 0.1333 + 0.2000)/3 = 0.8000/3 = 0.2667
OSPI
- Utica: ((2*0.4667)+0.1555)/3 = (0.9334+0.1555)/3 = 0.3630
- Burningham: ((2*0.1333)+0.2667)/3 = (0.2666+0.2667)/3 = 0.1778
- Mora: ((2*0.2000)+0.2444)/3 = (0.4000+0.2444)/3 = 0.2148
- Turic: ((2*0.1333)+0.2667)/3 = (0.2666+0.2667)/3 = 0.1778
Final rankings would therefore be:
- Utica
- Mora
- Turic (via H2H results)
- Burningham
Other uses
When used in sports which allow draws, OSPI can be modified to give similar functionality by counting draws as half a win.
This adjusts the winning percentage formula to the following:
WP = ((HomeWins * 0.6) + (AwayWins * 1.4) + (HomeDraws * 0.3) + (AwayDraws * 0.7)) / Games Played
As before, neutral games are included in the calculation with a modifier of 1.0 (or 0.5 for draws).
References
Lua error: Cannot create process: proc_open(/home4/iltornan/lua/error.log): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory